<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 265 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389382</link>
    <description>The High Court granted interim stay on the impugned notices challenging assessments for Assessment Years 2012-13 and 2013-14 under section 148 of the Income Tax Act. The Court found the notices lacked jurisdiction due to potential change of opinion by the Assessing Officer and absence of failure to disclose material facts during regular assessment. The stay was issued to prevent immediate adverse actions until the final decision on the validity of the assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2019 15:00:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=596475" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 265 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389382</link>
      <description>The High Court granted interim stay on the impugned notices challenging assessments for Assessment Years 2012-13 and 2013-14 under section 148 of the Income Tax Act. The Court found the notices lacked jurisdiction due to potential change of opinion by the Assessing Officer and absence of failure to disclose material facts during regular assessment. The stay was issued to prevent immediate adverse actions until the final decision on the validity of the assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389382</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>