<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 263 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389380</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Commissioner failed to show that the assessment orders were erroneous and prejudicial to the Revenue. The Commissioner lacked independent inquiry or additional material to support the allegations. Consequently, the Tribunal quashed the orders under Section 263, upholding the assessment orders by the AO and allowing the assessees&#039; appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2019 14:59:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=596472" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 263 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389380</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Commissioner failed to show that the assessment orders were erroneous and prejudicial to the Revenue. The Commissioner lacked independent inquiry or additional material to support the allegations. Consequently, the Tribunal quashed the orders under Section 263, upholding the assessment orders by the AO and allowing the assessees&#039; appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389380</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>