<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 262 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389379</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeals, canceling the penalty orders for all the assessment years in question. The decisions were based on the principles of natural justice, procedural fairness, and the requirement for clear and specific charges in penalty notices. The Tribunal&#039;s order emphasized the importance of specifying the exact charge in penalty proceedings to ensure fairness and transparency.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2019 14:58:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=596471" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 262 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389379</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeals, canceling the penalty orders for all the assessment years in question. The decisions were based on the principles of natural justice, procedural fairness, and the requirement for clear and specific charges in penalty notices. The Tribunal&#039;s order emphasized the importance of specifying the exact charge in penalty proceedings to ensure fairness and transparency.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389379</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>