<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 256 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389373</link>
    <description>The ITAT affirmed the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) for concealment of income and non-disclosure of material facts related to penalty expenses on excise duty. The appellant&#039;s arguments regarding fair opportunity, consideration of replies, nature of penalty expenses, recording of satisfaction, and non-appearance were dismissed, upholding the penalty imposed by the Ld. CIT(A) and AO. The ITAT found no grounds to interfere with the decision and confirmed the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2019 19:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=596462" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 256 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389373</link>
      <description>The ITAT affirmed the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) for concealment of income and non-disclosure of material facts related to penalty expenses on excise duty. The appellant&#039;s arguments regarding fair opportunity, consideration of replies, nature of penalty expenses, recording of satisfaction, and non-appearance were dismissed, upholding the penalty imposed by the Ld. CIT(A) and AO. The ITAT found no grounds to interfere with the decision and confirmed the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389373</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>