<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (5) TMI 18 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20646</link>
    <description>A diesel-run generator used in business was treated as machinery eligible for depreciation under section 32(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The decisive test was whether it was electrically operated with an in-built motor; a generator that merely produces electricity, and is not itself operated by electricity, does not fall within &quot;electrical machinery&quot;. On that basis, the generator was held not to be electrical machinery and was entitled to triple-shift allowance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 May 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Oct 2013 18:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=59645" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (5) TMI 18 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20646</link>
      <description>A diesel-run generator used in business was treated as machinery eligible for depreciation under section 32(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The decisive test was whether it was electrically operated with an in-built motor; a generator that merely produces electricity, and is not itself operated by electricity, does not fall within &quot;electrical machinery&quot;. On that basis, the generator was held not to be electrical machinery and was entitled to triple-shift allowance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 May 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20646</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>