<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 244 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389361</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the exporter&#039;s appeal against the rejection of their request to amend the reward option in shipping bills from &#039;No&#039; to &#039;Yes&#039; for claiming MEIS benefits. The Tribunal considered the error as a procedural defect that could be corrected through an amendment, noting the appellant&#039;s declaration of intent in all shipping bills. Relying on precedent judgments, the Tribunal held that the rejection by the Commissioner was not legally sustainable and directed Customs Authorities to permit the requested amendment upon submission of the Tribunal&#039;s order. The appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2019 12:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=596443" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 244 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389361</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the exporter&#039;s appeal against the rejection of their request to amend the reward option in shipping bills from &#039;No&#039; to &#039;Yes&#039; for claiming MEIS benefits. The Tribunal considered the error as a procedural defect that could be corrected through an amendment, noting the appellant&#039;s declaration of intent in all shipping bills. Relying on precedent judgments, the Tribunal held that the rejection by the Commissioner was not legally sustainable and directed Customs Authorities to permit the requested amendment upon submission of the Tribunal&#039;s order. The appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389361</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>