<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 242 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389359</link>
    <description>The court held that the suit filed during the moratorium period under Section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) was non-maintainable as it was barred by law. The cessation of the moratorium did not revive the right to adjudicate the suit. Therefore, the plaint was rejected under Order VII Rule 11 of the Civil Procedure Code (CPC), and the related application was closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2019 13:29:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=596439" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 242 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389359</link>
      <description>The court held that the suit filed during the moratorium period under Section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) was non-maintainable as it was barred by law. The cessation of the moratorium did not revive the right to adjudicate the suit. Therefore, the plaint was rejected under Order VII Rule 11 of the Civil Procedure Code (CPC), and the related application was closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389359</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>