https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389358 In anticipatory bail proceedings, the Court's power under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is confined to granting or refusing bail and imposing only lawful conditions. It cannot direct the investigating agency to issue prior notice before arrest, because such a requirement is not contemplated by the statutory scheme and would intrude on the agency's lawful power of arrest. The Delhi High Court therefore held that a three-working-days notice direction was unsustainable and set aside the impugned order. en-us Thu, 21 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 07 Nov 2024 13:24:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389358 In anticipatory bail proceedings, the Court's power under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is confined to granting or refusing bail and imposing only lawful conditions. It cannot direct the investigating agency to issue prior notice before arrest, because such a requirement is not contemplated by the statutory scheme and would intrude on the agency's lawful power of arrest. The Delhi High Court therefore held that a three-working-days notice direction was unsustainable and set aside the impugned order. Case-Laws Money Laundering Thu, 21 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389358