https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389357 In D.B. Misc. Application No. 82/2019, the High Court allowed the application to recall the order dated 13.09.2019. In D.B.Central Excise Appeal No.96/2018, the erroneous order was acknowledged and withdrawn due to a circular on tax effect. In D.B.Central Excise Appeal No.126/2017, the Court interpreted Rule 4(7) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, allowing the assessee to avail credit for services not fully paid based on a circular permitting credit for reduced payments or withheld amounts, including performance guarantees. The Court ruled against the Revenue's argument and dismissed the appeal. en-us Tue, 03 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 27 Oct 2020 12:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389357 In D.B. Misc. Application No. 82/2019, the High Court allowed the application to recall the order dated 13.09.2019. In D.B.Central Excise Appeal No.96/2018, the erroneous order was acknowledged and withdrawn due to a circular on tax effect. In D.B.Central Excise Appeal No.126/2017, the Court interpreted Rule 4(7) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, allowing the assessee to avail credit for services not fully paid based on a circular permitting credit for reduced payments or withheld amounts, including performance guarantees. The Court ruled against the Revenue's argument and dismissed the appeal. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 03 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389357