https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389351 The appeal was allowed, and the case was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for further consideration. The Commissioner was directed to reassess the documentary evidence provided by the Appellant to establish the nexus between input services and output services for export, determining eligibility for the refund of accumulated CENVAT Credit under Rule 5 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. en-us Thu, 25 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 06 Dec 2019 13:04:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389351 The appeal was allowed, and the case was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for further consideration. The Commissioner was directed to reassess the documentary evidence provided by the Appellant to establish the nexus between input services and output services for export, determining eligibility for the refund of accumulated CENVAT Credit under Rule 5 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 25 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389351