<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1723 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284709</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, emphasizing the importance of providing an opportunity for cross-examination in assessments based on third-party statements. The decision was based on upholding principles of natural justice and following legal precedents, ultimately leading to the deletion of the disputed addition and allowing the appeal filed by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2019 11:27:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=596404" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1723 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284709</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, emphasizing the importance of providing an opportunity for cross-examination in assessments based on third-party statements. The decision was based on upholding principles of natural justice and following legal precedents, ultimately leading to the deletion of the disputed addition and allowing the appeal filed by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284709</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>