<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 216 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389333</link>
    <description>The court upheld the validity of the reassessment order under Section 143(3) read with Section 147, finding that the reopening was justified due to failure to disclose material facts fully and truly. The court directed the petitioner to file a regular appeal before the appellate authority and emphasized exhausting statutory appellate remedies before seeking relief under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2020 17:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=596364" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 216 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389333</link>
      <description>The court upheld the validity of the reassessment order under Section 143(3) read with Section 147, finding that the reopening was justified due to failure to disclose material facts fully and truly. The court directed the petitioner to file a regular appeal before the appellate authority and emphasized exhausting statutory appellate remedies before seeking relief under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389333</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>