<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 202 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389319</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; decision to restrict additions to 12.5% of non-genuine purchases in each assessment year, considering the nature of the business and specific circumstances. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, acknowledging the goods were bought but possibly to evade taxes and generate undisclosed profits, thus addressing revenue leakage by adding the profit element. The judgment was pronounced on 25.10.2019.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2019 12:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=596342" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 202 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389319</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; decision to restrict additions to 12.5% of non-genuine purchases in each assessment year, considering the nature of the business and specific circumstances. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, acknowledging the goods were bought but possibly to evade taxes and generate undisclosed profits, thus addressing revenue leakage by adding the profit element. The judgment was pronounced on 25.10.2019.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389319</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>