<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 201 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389318</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed both appeals of the appellant, setting aside the penalties imposed under section 271B for failure to comply with section 44AB and section 271(1)(c) for alleged suppression of income. The judgments clarified that penalties cannot be imposed when income is determined on an estimate basis, ensuring adherence to legal provisions and precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2019 12:10:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=596340" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 201 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389318</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed both appeals of the appellant, setting aside the penalties imposed under section 271B for failure to comply with section 44AB and section 271(1)(c) for alleged suppression of income. The judgments clarified that penalties cannot be imposed when income is determined on an estimate basis, ensuring adherence to legal provisions and precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389318</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>