<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 191 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389308</link>
    <description>A resolution plan under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 must satisfy statutory requirements on insolvency resolution process costs, treatment of operational creditors, applicant eligibility, and compliance with prescribed regulations before approval by the Adjudicating Authority. The committee of creditors&#039; approval by the requisite voting share was treated as a commercial decision, and its feasibility, viability, and implementation assessment was not open to interference on merits. Requests for automatic waivers or approvals concerning pending proceedings were not granted as part of the plan, leaving affected parties to pursue remedies before the competent forums. On that basis, the plan was found compliant with the Code and approved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2019 11:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=596321" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 191 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389308</link>
      <description>A resolution plan under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 must satisfy statutory requirements on insolvency resolution process costs, treatment of operational creditors, applicant eligibility, and compliance with prescribed regulations before approval by the Adjudicating Authority. The committee of creditors&#039; approval by the requisite voting share was treated as a commercial decision, and its feasibility, viability, and implementation assessment was not open to interference on merits. Requests for automatic waivers or approvals concerning pending proceedings were not granted as part of the plan, leaving affected parties to pursue remedies before the competent forums. On that basis, the plan was found compliant with the Code and approved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389308</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>