https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=50556 Whether the High Court ought to interfere, under Article 226/227 of the Constitution, with an Order passed by the National Company Law Tribunal in a proceeding under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, ignoring the availability of a statutory remedy of appeal to the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal and if so, under what circumstances? - NCLT and NCLAT would not have jurisdiction to adjudicate upon disputes such as those arising under MMDR Act, 1957 - HC was justified to interfere. en-us Thu, 05 Dec 2019 11:11:37 +0530 Thu, 05 Dec 2019 11:11:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=50556 Whether the High Court ought to interfere, under Article 226/227 of the Constitution, with an Order passed by the National Company Law Tribunal in a proceeding under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, ignoring the availability of a statutory remedy of appeal to the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal and if so, under what circumstances? - NCLT and NCLAT would not have jurisdiction to adjudicate upon disputes such as those arising under MMDR Act, 1957 - HC was justified to interfere. Highlights Insolvency and Bankruptcy Thu, 05 Dec 2019 11:11:37 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=50556