<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 188 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389305</link>
    <description>An insolvency tribunal cannot exercise judicial review over a public law decision taken under a special statute, and a High Court may entertain a writ petition where the NCLT acts beyond its jurisdiction despite an available statutory appeal. On the mining lease dispute, the NCLT lacked power to direct execution of supplementary lease deeds, so writ review was justified. By contrast, allegations of fraudulent or malicious initiation of CIRP fall within the insolvency fora&#039;s adjudicatory domain because the Code expressly covers fraud in initiation and related conduct, with appellate scrutiny by the NCLAT. The appeal failed on the lease issue, while fraud-related jurisdiction remained within the insolvency framework.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 14:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=596316" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 188 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389305</link>
      <description>An insolvency tribunal cannot exercise judicial review over a public law decision taken under a special statute, and a High Court may entertain a writ petition where the NCLT acts beyond its jurisdiction despite an available statutory appeal. On the mining lease dispute, the NCLT lacked power to direct execution of supplementary lease deeds, so writ review was justified. By contrast, allegations of fraudulent or malicious initiation of CIRP fall within the insolvency fora&#039;s adjudicatory domain because the Code expressly covers fraud in initiation and related conduct, with appellate scrutiny by the NCLAT. The appeal failed on the lease issue, while fraud-related jurisdiction remained within the insolvency framework.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389305</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>