<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Employees&#039; Dues Not Paramount Over All Debts; Prioritized Over Unsecured Claims Per Section 169(2) of Land Revenue Code.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=50551</link>
    <description>Recovery of dues from company - employees dues - priority claim on debts - - Section 529A of the Companies Act, which gives workers’ dues a priority over all other debts, cannot be applied to the instant case in view of Section 167 of the Societies Act - Merely by virtue of being recoverable as arrears of land revenue, the employees’ dues, in respect of which a recovery certificate had been issued by the Industrial Court, cannot be treated as a paramount charge in terms of Section 169(1) of the Land Revenue Code. Instead, under 169(2) of the Land Revenue Code, they would take precedence only over unsecured claims.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2019 10:26:48 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2019 10:26:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=596295" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Employees&#039; Dues Not Paramount Over All Debts; Prioritized Over Unsecured Claims Per Section 169(2) of Land Revenue Code.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=50551</link>
      <description>Recovery of dues from company - employees dues - priority claim on debts - - Section 529A of the Companies Act, which gives workers’ dues a priority over all other debts, cannot be applied to the instant case in view of Section 167 of the Societies Act - Merely by virtue of being recoverable as arrears of land revenue, the employees’ dues, in respect of which a recovery certificate had been issued by the Industrial Court, cannot be treated as a paramount charge in terms of Section 169(1) of the Land Revenue Code. Instead, under 169(2) of the Land Revenue Code, they would take precedence only over unsecured claims.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2019 10:26:48 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=50551</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>