<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (3) TMI 3 - JAMMU AND KASHMIR High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20627</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petition, quashed the impugned orders, and awarded costs to the petitioner. The judgment emphasized the importance of adhering to legal procedures, providing valid reasons for actions taken under the Income-tax Act, and avoiding arbitrary or unjustified measures that could lead to harassment of taxpayers.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:04:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=59626" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (3) TMI 3 - JAMMU AND KASHMIR High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20627</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petition, quashed the impugned orders, and awarded costs to the petitioner. The judgment emphasized the importance of adhering to legal procedures, providing valid reasons for actions taken under the Income-tax Act, and avoiding arbitrary or unjustified measures that could lead to harassment of taxpayers.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20627</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>