<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 140 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389257</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) for furnishing inaccurate income particulars and confirmed the classification of interest income from fixed deposits as &quot;income from other sources.&quot; The Tribunal emphasized that procedural defects in the notice did not invalidate penalty proceedings, as proper satisfaction had been recorded by the Assessing Officer. The appeal filed by the assessee was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2019 12:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=596206" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 140 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389257</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) for furnishing inaccurate income particulars and confirmed the classification of interest income from fixed deposits as &quot;income from other sources.&quot; The Tribunal emphasized that procedural defects in the notice did not invalidate penalty proceedings, as proper satisfaction had been recorded by the Assessing Officer. The appeal filed by the assessee was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389257</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>