<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 136 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389253</link>
    <description>A reassessment cannot be sustained where the section 148 notice is issued by an officer lacking jurisdiction, because valid notice by the Assessing Officer having jurisdiction is a statutory precondition to reopening. Transfer of the case to the jurisdictional Assessing Officer does not cure the original jurisdictional defect, and the assessee&#039;s participation cannot validate a notice issued without lawful authority. Section 292BB applies only to defects in service of notice, not to the absence of power to issue it. In the absence of a fresh section 148 notice by the jurisdictional Assessing Officer, the reassessment was held invalid and was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2019 10:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=596201" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 136 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389253</link>
      <description>A reassessment cannot be sustained where the section 148 notice is issued by an officer lacking jurisdiction, because valid notice by the Assessing Officer having jurisdiction is a statutory precondition to reopening. Transfer of the case to the jurisdictional Assessing Officer does not cure the original jurisdictional defect, and the assessee&#039;s participation cannot validate a notice issued without lawful authority. Section 292BB applies only to defects in service of notice, not to the absence of power to issue it. In the absence of a fresh section 148 notice by the jurisdictional Assessing Officer, the reassessment was held invalid and was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389253</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>