<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 124 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389241</link>
    <description>The tribunal found the rejection of the refund claims unjustified, as the services in question were demonstrated to be used for providing output services. Except for rent-a-cab service, all other services were deemed eligible for credit/refund. The impugned order was modified to allow credit/refund for the specified services, with the appeals partly allowed in favor of the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2019 11:49:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=596182" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 124 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389241</link>
      <description>The tribunal found the rejection of the refund claims unjustified, as the services in question were demonstrated to be used for providing output services. Except for rent-a-cab service, all other services were deemed eligible for credit/refund. The impugned order was modified to allow credit/refund for the specified services, with the appeals partly allowed in favor of the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389241</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>