<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 122 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389239</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit was denied for Group Medical Insurance, insurance on assets and business activities, and food or Sodexo coupons, as these were treated as falling outside input service or as welfare perquisites for personal consumption; credit was allowed for rent-a-cab and bus pass services because they were connected with employee movement and productivity. Because the dispute turned on interpretation of the input service definition and no suppression or intent to evade was established, the extended period of limitation was unavailable and penalties were set aside. Demand was remanded for re-quantification for the normal period only.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2019 11:48:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=596178" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 122 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389239</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit was denied for Group Medical Insurance, insurance on assets and business activities, and food or Sodexo coupons, as these were treated as falling outside input service or as welfare perquisites for personal consumption; credit was allowed for rent-a-cab and bus pass services because they were connected with employee movement and productivity. Because the dispute turned on interpretation of the input service definition and no suppression or intent to evade was established, the extended period of limitation was unavailable and penalties were set aside. Demand was remanded for re-quantification for the normal period only.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389239</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>