<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 120 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389237</link>
    <description>The Appeals were allowed in favor of the Appellants as the Division Bench held that clubbing rent for service tax calculation among co-owners was unjustified. Each individual owner was granted the benefit of the exemption notification for small service providers. The decision emphasized the importance of recognizing individual ownership rights in determining service tax liability for co-owners of a property.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2019 14:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=596174" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 120 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389237</link>
      <description>The Appeals were allowed in favor of the Appellants as the Division Bench held that clubbing rent for service tax calculation among co-owners was unjustified. Each individual owner was granted the benefit of the exemption notification for small service providers. The decision emphasized the importance of recognizing individual ownership rights in determining service tax liability for co-owners of a property.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389237</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>