<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 114 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389231</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled that the cost of corrugated boxes supplied free of cost by the buyers must be included in the assessable value of Metal Containers. The demand for the extended period was set aside as there was no evidence of suppression or mala fide intention. While the appeals were partly allowed on the limitation issue, the demand on merits was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2019 11:21:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=596165" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 114 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389231</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled that the cost of corrugated boxes supplied free of cost by the buyers must be included in the assessable value of Metal Containers. The demand for the extended period was set aside as there was no evidence of suppression or mala fide intention. While the appeals were partly allowed on the limitation issue, the demand on merits was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389231</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>