https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389224 The tribunal confirmed the demand for unpaid excise duty, penalties, and confiscation due to the appellant's negligent conduct in pursuing the appeal, allegations of manufacturing and clearing excisable goods without payment of duties, seizure of finished goods during search operations, inadequate record-keeping, and violations of Central Excise Rules 2002. The denial of redemption fine and imposition of penalties were upheld, leading to the dismissal of the appeals for lack of prosecution and merit. en-us Thu, 07 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 04 Dec 2019 10:59:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389224 The tribunal confirmed the demand for unpaid excise duty, penalties, and confiscation due to the appellant's negligent conduct in pursuing the appeal, allegations of manufacturing and clearing excisable goods without payment of duties, seizure of finished goods during search operations, inadequate record-keeping, and violations of Central Excise Rules 2002. The denial of redemption fine and imposition of penalties were upheld, leading to the dismissal of the appeals for lack of prosecution and merit. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 07 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389224