<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (4) TMI 1211 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284681</link>
    <description>Permission under the Andhra Pradesh Agricultural Land (Conversion for Non-Agricultural Purposes) Act, 2006 may validly be required before layout approval where land remains agricultural in revenue records and is proposed for non-agricultural use, because the urban development law and the conversion statute operate in distinct fields. The special-law argument was not accepted on those facts. The 2006 Act was treated as prospective, so clearance cannot be insisted upon for land already put to residential or other non-agricultural use before the Act commenced, subject to proof of that factual position before the competent authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2019 14:13:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=596106" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (4) TMI 1211 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284681</link>
      <description>Permission under the Andhra Pradesh Agricultural Land (Conversion for Non-Agricultural Purposes) Act, 2006 may validly be required before layout approval where land remains agricultural in revenue records and is proposed for non-agricultural use, because the urban development law and the conversion statute operate in distinct fields. The special-law argument was not accepted on those facts. The 2006 Act was treated as prospective, so clearance cannot be insisted upon for land already put to residential or other non-agricultural use before the Act commenced, subject to proof of that factual position before the competent authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284681</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>