<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 94 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389211</link>
    <description>The court, presided over by Honorable Justice A.K. Jayasankaran Nambiar, ruled in favor of the petitioner in the challenge against detention notices (Ext.P8 and P11) for goods transported, citing insufficient reasons under Section 129 of the CGST/SGST Act. The detaining authority&#039;s claim of undervaluation due to discounts was not upheld. The judgment directed the immediate release of the goods and the vehicle to the petitioner, with files to be forwarded for adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2025 16:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=596086" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 94 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389211</link>
      <description>The court, presided over by Honorable Justice A.K. Jayasankaran Nambiar, ruled in favor of the petitioner in the challenge against detention notices (Ext.P8 and P11) for goods transported, citing insufficient reasons under Section 129 of the CGST/SGST Act. The detaining authority&#039;s claim of undervaluation due to discounts was not upheld. The judgment directed the immediate release of the goods and the vehicle to the petitioner, with files to be forwarded for adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389211</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>