https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389176 Concurrent findings in a second appeal under Section 100 CPC may be disturbed only if they are perverse or based on misreading of evidence, and the record here disclosed no such infirmity. The suit for recovery was founded on a dishonoured cheque, while the defence of prior cash payment was undermined by contradictions in the defendant's evidence on the payee's identity and the circumstances of payment. As no documentary proof supported the plea of discharge, the statutory presumption attached to the cheque remained unrebutted, and no substantial question of law arose for interference. en-us Thu, 21 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 Dec 2019 10:11:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389176 Concurrent findings in a second appeal under Section 100 CPC may be disturbed only if they are perverse or based on misreading of evidence, and the record here disclosed no such infirmity. The suit for recovery was founded on a dishonoured cheque, while the defence of prior cash payment was undermined by contradictions in the defendant's evidence on the payee's identity and the circumstances of payment. As no documentary proof supported the plea of discharge, the statutory presumption attached to the cheque remained unrebutted, and no substantial question of law arose for interference. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 21 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389176