https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389170 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case involving allegations of clandestine removal of finished goods and disputed cenvat credit on supplementary invoices. The Tribunal found no conclusive evidence of clandestine removal and allowed the appellant to claim cenvat credit on the supplementary invoices, citing precedents and lack of concrete evidence. Consequently, the appeals were allowed, and the penalties imposed by the Revenue were reversed in favor of the appellant. en-us Mon, 29 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 04 Dec 2019 10:56:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389170 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case involving allegations of clandestine removal of finished goods and disputed cenvat credit on supplementary invoices. The Tribunal found no conclusive evidence of clandestine removal and allowed the appellant to claim cenvat credit on the supplementary invoices, citing precedents and lack of concrete evidence. Consequently, the appeals were allowed, and the penalties imposed by the Revenue were reversed in favor of the appellant. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 29 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389170