<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 52 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389169</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, confirming that the imported machineries were assets of the Corporate Debtor. It held that the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) had the right to take control of these assets. The Customs Authority&#039;s actions to auction the goods post-moratorium were deemed invalid, as the moratorium under Section 14 of the I&amp;amp;B Code took precedence. The appeal was dismissed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2021 13:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=596014" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 52 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389169</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, confirming that the imported machineries were assets of the Corporate Debtor. It held that the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) had the right to take control of these assets. The Customs Authority&#039;s actions to auction the goods post-moratorium were deemed invalid, as the moratorium under Section 14 of the I&amp;amp;B Code took precedence. The appeal was dismissed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389169</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>