<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (9) TMI 1244 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284668</link>
    <description>Interim modification of a provisional attachment under income-tax law was granted to balance business continuity with revenue protection. Recognising that the petitioner was an operating company, the Court allowed normal banking operations and receipt of debts, receivables, loans and advances into designated bank accounts, while requiring monthly reporting and continuation of instalment payments. To secure possible tax recovery, it restrained transfer or alienation of immovable assets, fixed assets, movable plant and machinery, and dividend remittances abroad, and required prior intimation before any repatriation of funds. The relief was therefore granted in modified form subject to protective conditions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2019 18:58:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=596008" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (9) TMI 1244 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284668</link>
      <description>Interim modification of a provisional attachment under income-tax law was granted to balance business continuity with revenue protection. Recognising that the petitioner was an operating company, the Court allowed normal banking operations and receipt of debts, receivables, loans and advances into designated bank accounts, while requiring monthly reporting and continuation of instalment payments. To secure possible tax recovery, it restrained transfer or alienation of immovable assets, fixed assets, movable plant and machinery, and dividend remittances abroad, and required prior intimation before any repatriation of funds. The relief was therefore granted in modified form subject to protective conditions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284668</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>