https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284666 In an appeal against acquittal, the appellate court may fully review and reappreciate the evidence, but it should not disturb a reasonable and plausible view taken by the trial court merely because another view is possible. The accused continues to enjoy a reinforced presumption of innocence after acquittal, and expressions such as "substantial and compelling reasons" are only cautionary and do not limit the statutory power of review. Applying these principles, the trial court's view was held to be a possible one on the evidence, so the High Court's reversal of acquittal was unjustified and the acquittal was restored. en-us Thu, 15 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 02 Feb 2024 11:29:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284666 In an appeal against acquittal, the appellate court may fully review and reappreciate the evidence, but it should not disturb a reasonable and plausible view taken by the trial court merely because another view is possible. The accused continues to enjoy a reinforced presumption of innocence after acquittal, and expressions such as "substantial and compelling reasons" are only cautionary and do not limit the statutory power of review. Applying these principles, the trial court's view was held to be a possible one on the evidence, so the High Court's reversal of acquittal was unjustified and the acquittal was restored. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 15 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284666