<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 45 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389162</link>
    <description>The Court held that the petitioner, a transporter under the GST Act, had the right to dispute issues regarding the intercepted conveyance. The decision denying locus standi was deemed unjust and against natural justice principles. The Court quashed the order, directing the respondent to allow the petitioner to submit objections and to decide the matter promptly. The case was disposed of with instructions for a fair hearing and consideration of all objections.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2025 10:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=595991" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 45 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389162</link>
      <description>The Court held that the petitioner, a transporter under the GST Act, had the right to dispute issues regarding the intercepted conveyance. The decision denying locus standi was deemed unjust and against natural justice principles. The Court quashed the order, directing the respondent to allow the petitioner to submit objections and to decide the matter promptly. The case was disposed of with instructions for a fair hearing and consideration of all objections.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389162</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>