<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 38 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389155</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting the penalty levied under Section 271AAB as no search under Section 132 was conducted against the assessee. The judgment emphasized that the penalty under Section 271AAB can only be levied if a search is initiated under Section 132, which was not the case here. Therefore, the penalty was deemed invalid, and other grounds were not adjudicated as the primary jurisdictional issue was decided in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2019 16:57:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=595983" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 38 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389155</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting the penalty levied under Section 271AAB as no search under Section 132 was conducted against the assessee. The judgment emphasized that the penalty under Section 271AAB can only be levied if a search is initiated under Section 132, which was not the case here. Therefore, the penalty was deemed invalid, and other grounds were not adjudicated as the primary jurisdictional issue was decided in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389155</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>