<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 37 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389154</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, deleting the additions made under Section 68 for share application money and the disallowances under Section 14A read with Rule 8D. The Tribunal emphasized that such additions were not sustainable in the absence of incriminating material found during the search, citing judicial precedents. The judgment highlighted the limited scope of assessments under Section 153A when no incriminating material is discovered during the search.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2019 16:56:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=595982" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 37 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389154</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, deleting the additions made under Section 68 for share application money and the disallowances under Section 14A read with Rule 8D. The Tribunal emphasized that such additions were not sustainable in the absence of incriminating material found during the search, citing judicial precedents. The judgment highlighted the limited scope of assessments under Section 153A when no incriminating material is discovered during the search.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389154</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>