<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 29 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389146</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the CIT(A) in allowing the deduction of the penalty amount under section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, ruling that the penalty was compensatory in nature and not a violation of the law, as the appellant&#039;s failure to meet contractual obligations did not constitute a legal offense. The Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging this decision was dismissed, affirming that the penalty was deductible as per relevant legal precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2020 17:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=595969" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 29 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389146</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the CIT(A) in allowing the deduction of the penalty amount under section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, ruling that the penalty was compensatory in nature and not a violation of the law, as the appellant&#039;s failure to meet contractual obligations did not constitute a legal offense. The Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging this decision was dismissed, affirming that the penalty was deductible as per relevant legal precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389146</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>