https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389123 The court set aside the assessment order for the assessment year 2016-2017 due to a lack of proof of notice service to the petitioner before the order was passed. The matter was remitted back to the Assessing Officer for reassessment, emphasizing the duty to prove notice service. Specific terms for the reassessment process were outlined, including the petitioner's response to the notice of proposal within two weeks, a personal hearing, and issuance of a fresh assessment order within six weeks. The court clarified that reassessment should be unbiased and in compliance with the law, with no costs awarded. en-us Mon, 11 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 02 Dec 2019 11:55:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389123 The court set aside the assessment order for the assessment year 2016-2017 due to a lack of proof of notice service to the petitioner before the order was passed. The matter was remitted back to the Assessing Officer for reassessment, emphasizing the duty to prove notice service. Specific terms for the reassessment process were outlined, including the petitioner's response to the notice of proposal within two weeks, a personal hearing, and issuance of a fresh assessment order within six weeks. The court clarified that reassessment should be unbiased and in compliance with the law, with no costs awarded. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 11 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389123