<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 4 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389121</link>
    <description>The High Court quashed the order and judgment passed by the Metropolitan Magistrate regarding a dishonored cheque for a friendly loan. Due to confusion over jurisdiction and lack of information on the complaint status, the appellant faced delays. The Court directed the Trial Court to reinstate the Complaint Case and ordered the parties to appear, stressing the need for procedural clarity. The petition was allowed, recognizing the appellant&#039;s struggles in the legal process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2019 11:46:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=595925" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 4 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389121</link>
      <description>The High Court quashed the order and judgment passed by the Metropolitan Magistrate regarding a dishonored cheque for a friendly loan. Due to confusion over jurisdiction and lack of information on the complaint status, the appellant faced delays. The Court directed the Trial Court to reinstate the Complaint Case and ordered the parties to appear, stressing the need for procedural clarity. The petition was allowed, recognizing the appellant&#039;s struggles in the legal process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389121</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>