<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 1702 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284659</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the reopening of the assessment under Section 148 as the Assessing Officer failed to verify information and acted on suspicion rather than belief. Consequently, all additions made on the merits regarding long-term capital gains were deleted, following the precedent set by the ITAT, Agra Bench. The appeal of the assessee was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2019 11:41:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=595922" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 1702 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284659</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the reopening of the assessment under Section 148 as the Assessing Officer failed to verify information and acted on suspicion rather than belief. Consequently, all additions made on the merits regarding long-term capital gains were deleted, following the precedent set by the ITAT, Agra Bench. The appeal of the assessee was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284659</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>