<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 1434 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284656</link>
    <description>The High Court resolved the jurisdictional issue by directing the Magistrate to proceed with the dishonoured cheque case. The conflicting judgments emphasized the importance of following the hierarchy of courts and established legal principles. The ruling clarified that lower courts must adhere to High Court judgments unless overruled by the Supreme Court, even with stay orders in place.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2019 11:38:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=595919" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 1434 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284656</link>
      <description>The High Court resolved the jurisdictional issue by directing the Magistrate to proceed with the dishonoured cheque case. The conflicting judgments emphasized the importance of following the hierarchy of courts and established legal principles. The ruling clarified that lower courts must adhere to High Court judgments unless overruled by the Supreme Court, even with stay orders in place.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284656</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>