<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (8) TMI 13 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20592</link>
    <description>HC held that the assessee&#039;s conduct squarely attracted penalty under s. 271(1)(c) for concealment of income and furnishing inaccurate particulars. The assessee initially filed a return showing loss and later revised it showing profit, without maintaining books of account, necessitating estimated assessment. HC ruled that the change from loss to profit itself indicated suppression of income, and the fact that income was ultimately assessed on an estimated basis did not insulate the assessee from penalty. The reasons adopted by the Tribunal to cancel the penalty were found legally untenable, and the penalty levied under the Explanation to s. 271(1)(c) was restored.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2025 17:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=59591" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (8) TMI 13 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20592</link>
      <description>HC held that the assessee&#039;s conduct squarely attracted penalty under s. 271(1)(c) for concealment of income and furnishing inaccurate particulars. The assessee initially filed a return showing loss and later revised it showing profit, without maintaining books of account, necessitating estimated assessment. HC ruled that the change from loss to profit itself indicated suppression of income, and the fact that income was ultimately assessed on an estimated basis did not insulate the assessee from penalty. The reasons adopted by the Tribunal to cancel the penalty were found legally untenable, and the penalty levied under the Explanation to s. 271(1)(c) was restored.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20592</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>