https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389113 Detention of goods and vehicle was upheld where the e-way bill carried incorrect vehicle particulars, as the statutory transit-document requirements were not complied with at the time of interception. A subsequent e-way bill showing the correct vehicle number, produced only after detention, did not cure the defect. The Court nevertheless directed release of the goods and vehicle on the petitioner furnishing a bank guarantee for the tax and penalty determined in the detention order, and ordered the records to be forwarded to the adjudicating authority for action under the confiscation provisions. en-us Wed, 27 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 12 Mar 2025 16:59:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389113 Detention of goods and vehicle was upheld where the e-way bill carried incorrect vehicle particulars, as the statutory transit-document requirements were not complied with at the time of interception. A subsequent e-way bill showing the correct vehicle number, produced only after detention, did not cure the defect. The Court nevertheless directed release of the goods and vehicle on the petitioner furnishing a bank guarantee for the tax and penalty determined in the detention order, and ordered the records to be forwarded to the adjudicating authority for action under the confiscation provisions. Case-Laws GST Wed, 27 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389113