https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389112 A writ challenge to a customs adjudication order was held not maintainable because an efficacious statutory appeal was available under the Customs Act. The court found that complaints about non-supply of documents and denial of cross-examination went to the merits of the adjudication and were better examined in appeal. It also held that no exceptional circumstance was shown, such as lack of jurisdiction or a grave breach of natural justice, to justify interference under Article 226. Interference with the adjudication order was therefore declined. en-us Wed, 27 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 27 Jul 2021 15:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389112 A writ challenge to a customs adjudication order was held not maintainable because an efficacious statutory appeal was available under the Customs Act. The court found that complaints about non-supply of documents and denial of cross-examination went to the merits of the adjudication and were better examined in appeal. It also held that no exceptional circumstance was shown, such as lack of jurisdiction or a grave breach of natural justice, to justify interference under Article 226. Interference with the adjudication order was therefore declined. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 27 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389112