<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 1355 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389106</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found the rejection of the Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) valuation method by the Assessing Officer (AO) improper. The independent valuation report was deemed just and fair, leading to the deletion of the addition of Rs. 107,40,00,000/- under Section 56(2)(viia) of the Income Tax Act, in favor of the assessee. The appeal was allowed, and the order was pronounced on October 16, 2019.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Nov 2019 16:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=595868" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 1355 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389106</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found the rejection of the Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) valuation method by the Assessing Officer (AO) improper. The independent valuation report was deemed just and fair, leading to the deletion of the addition of Rs. 107,40,00,000/- under Section 56(2)(viia) of the Income Tax Act, in favor of the assessee. The appeal was allowed, and the order was pronounced on October 16, 2019.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389106</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>