https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284649 The appeal in this case, concerning the confiscation of goods for not meeting FSSAI standards, resulted in the redemption fine being set aside and the penalty reduced to Rs. 25,000. The judge considered the appellant's intention to re-export the goods and found the redemption fine unjustified. Relying on relevant High Court and Supreme Court decisions, the judge deemed the penalty excessive due to the goods not being prohibited and the lack of intent to violate laws. Ultimately, the decision allowed the appeal in part, eliminating the redemption fine, maintaining the re-export directive, and reducing the penalty. en-us Mon, 16 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 30 Nov 2019 15:53:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284649 The appeal in this case, concerning the confiscation of goods for not meeting FSSAI standards, resulted in the redemption fine being set aside and the penalty reduced to Rs. 25,000. The judge considered the appellant's intention to re-export the goods and found the redemption fine unjustified. Relying on relevant High Court and Supreme Court decisions, the judge deemed the penalty excessive due to the goods not being prohibited and the lack of intent to violate laws. Ultimately, the decision allowed the appeal in part, eliminating the redemption fine, maintaining the re-export directive, and reducing the penalty. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 16 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284649