https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389103 The court allowed both writ petitions, setting aside the attachment orders dated 27.02.2015 and 12.10.2010 on properties purchased by the petitioner before the attachment orders were issued. The court found that the petitioner was not the defaulter and had acquired the properties without encumbrances. The decision aimed to protect innocent purchasers' rights and ensure lawful attachment orders while allowing the tax department to pursue the defaulter for tax dues through appropriate legal channels. No costs were awarded, and connected miscellaneous petitions were closed. en-us Wed, 27 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 29 Nov 2019 18:09:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389103 The court allowed both writ petitions, setting aside the attachment orders dated 27.02.2015 and 12.10.2010 on properties purchased by the petitioner before the attachment orders were issued. The court found that the petitioner was not the defaulter and had acquired the properties without encumbrances. The decision aimed to protect innocent purchasers' rights and ensure lawful attachment orders while allowing the tax department to pursue the defaulter for tax dues through appropriate legal channels. No costs were awarded, and connected miscellaneous petitions were closed. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 27 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389103