<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 1344 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389095</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, holding that no service tax liability existed for Management Consultancy Services received before 18.4.2006. Consequently, the appellants were only liable for service tax of Rs. 48,76,268/- for April 2006 to March 2007, which was already paid, eliminating any penalty. The Tribunal also found that technical knowhow was not taxable under Consulting Engineering Services or Intellectual Property Services, allowing appeal No. ST/500/2009 and rejecting the Department&#039;s appeals Nos. ST/442-443/2009. The plea for a penalty under Section 78 was dismissed, and the cross objections were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2024 14:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=595821" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 1344 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389095</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, holding that no service tax liability existed for Management Consultancy Services received before 18.4.2006. Consequently, the appellants were only liable for service tax of Rs. 48,76,268/- for April 2006 to March 2007, which was already paid, eliminating any penalty. The Tribunal also found that technical knowhow was not taxable under Consulting Engineering Services or Intellectual Property Services, allowing appeal No. ST/500/2009 and rejecting the Department&#039;s appeals Nos. ST/442-443/2009. The plea for a penalty under Section 78 was dismissed, and the cross objections were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389095</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>