<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 1343 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389094</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee for statistical purposes, directing the AO to assess 1/3rd of the peak credit balance in the hands of the assessee for the assessment year 2008-09. The tribunal disagreed with the Ld CIT(A)&#039;s reasoning on certain withdrawals, finding them relevant to the peak credit balance. The issue was restored to the AO for verification of peak credit workings, with the final decision pronounced on 27th November 2019.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Nov 2019 12:51:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=595820" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 1343 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389094</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee for statistical purposes, directing the AO to assess 1/3rd of the peak credit balance in the hands of the assessee for the assessment year 2008-09. The tribunal disagreed with the Ld CIT(A)&#039;s reasoning on certain withdrawals, finding them relevant to the peak credit balance. The issue was restored to the AO for verification of peak credit workings, with the final decision pronounced on 27th November 2019.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389094</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>