<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 1338 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389089</link>
    <description>In the absence of any statutory time limit under the Customs Act, 1962 during the relevant period, a Board circular could not be used to deny conversion of shipping bills from Advance Authorisation to duty drawback merely because the let export order was issued after three months. The refusal was held unsustainable, and the request for conversion was directed to be considered and granted on remand, with consequential benefits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Nov 2019 12:51:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=595811" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 1338 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389089</link>
      <description>In the absence of any statutory time limit under the Customs Act, 1962 during the relevant period, a Board circular could not be used to deny conversion of shipping bills from Advance Authorisation to duty drawback merely because the let export order was issued after three months. The refusal was held unsustainable, and the request for conversion was directed to be considered and granted on remand, with consequential benefits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389089</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>